The emergence of vaping as an alternative to traditional cigarette smoking has prompted much research in recent years, particularly within the context of the Philippines. This review explores the existing literature surrounding vaping, analyzing its impact on public health, societal perceptions, and regulatory frameworks in the country.

In the Philippines, the rise of vaping can be attributed to several factors, including a growing awareness of the health risks associated with conventional tobacco use and the perception of vaping as a less harmful alternative. Several studies indicate that Filipino youth are increasingly attracted to vaping due to its colorful and appealing marketing strategies as well as the availability of various flavors. A study published in the Philippine Journal of Health Research highlighted that the prevalence of vaping among adolescents rose significantly over the past few years, raising concerns among health professionals and policymakers alike.

Moreover, the literature reveals mixed opinions regarding the health implications of vaping compared to smoking. While some researchers argue that e-cigarettes serve as a viable cessation tool for adult smokers, others emphasize the potential risks associated with nicotine addiction and long-term health effects. A notable research piece from the University of the Philippines indicated that while some smokers successfully transitioned to vaping, there is a notable number of non-smokers who are starting to vape, suggesting a potential gateway effect. This phenomenon is particularly alarming in the context of youth, as early exposure to nicotine is linked to increased likelihoods of future tobacco use.

In terms of regulation, the Philippine government has been gradually developing frameworks to address the growing vaping industry. The Vaporized Nicotine Products Regulation Act, which was enacted in 2021, aims to regulate the sale and use of e-cigarettes. However, the implementation of such regulations has faced challenges, including enforcement issues and the need for comprehensive public health policies. Literature indicates that a balanced approach is essential to regulate vaping effectively, ensuring that it is accessible for smokers seeking alternatives while protecting young people from potential risks.

In conclusion, the review of related literature on vaping in the Philippines indicates a complex interplay of health, societal perceptions, and regulation. While vaping presents opportunities for harm reduction among current smokers, it also poses risks, particularly among the youth. As research continues to evolve, it is crucial for stakeholders, including public health officials and policymakers, to engage in informed discussions and promote strategies that safeguard the health of Filipinos. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies assessing the long-term impacts of vaping and effectiveness of current regulations to adapt policies that protect public health.